Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Yepez, 09-50271 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 09-50271 Visitors: 20
Judges: Kozinski
Filed: Mar. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 672 F.3d 1125 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David YEPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Audenago Acosta-Montes, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 09-50271, 09-50409. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 1, 2012. Timothy C. Perry, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Michael Edmund Burke, Esquire, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant. ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon
More
672 F.3d 1125 (2012)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David YEPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Audenago Acosta-Montes, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 09-50271, 09-50409.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 1, 2012.

Timothy C. Perry, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Edmund Burke, Esquire, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge CHRISTEN did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer